Every so often a college professor wanders onto center stage with the public. This usually happens when he or she manages to actually connect some arcane theory with reality. A few examples
Harry Markowitz in the 1950s came up with his efficient frontier of risk and reward
Milton Friedman came up with Money Supply in the 1970s
Supply Side economics, the Laffer Curve got Reagan's attentino in the 1980s
The black Scholes model for option pricing won a Nobel Prize
And the guy with Freakonomics has sold a lot of books
Okay so what is the next brave new frontier of economics?
I think it is the first prof that points out the King has No New Clothes. Only manufacturing produces wealth. First we decided that the US would become a service economy. Then Jack Welch, the retired CEO of GE, started shipping intellectual property work overseas to China and India about 1989. So no surprise, we then decided to get rich investing in the stock market and playing state lotteries, indeed over 30 states now have lotteries, my take is that this is the only way citizens will continue to pay taxes.
BUt I digress. We have followed the stories of how make believe economies, Vegas, Dubai, Macau are now falling apart. The King has no new clothes, those are ultimate swap dollar service economies. There is no real wealth created, they float on a sea of minimum wage jobs. Shut the hotel for a month and there is nothing left.
Meanwhile the Tigers of Asia have built manufacturing economies. It is true the iPod was designed here and it is true the profits show up on the Apple financial statement. But where does the wealth reside? It seems to me that at the end of the day, the real wealth statement is
Who is a creditor
Who is a debtor
Whole countries like the US and Western Europe have become net debtors for the simple reason that citizens did not want to get their hands dirty so to speak. What's that old saying shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves in three generations? At the end of the Monopoly game, the group with the most income wins the game. Now China is lecturing the US on how to run the US banking system, quite a shift for a country that was pretty much destitute when Nixon went to visit, no heat in the buildings, etc.
So a new model needs to b e constructed that would probably include
Some sort of net money supply but divided by net borrowing,
or perhaps we adopt sort of a cash flow think for a country, does the wealth come from
earnings, and if so manufacturing or intangibles like renting hotel rooms
borrowings
investing, ie selling assets, rather like cutting up the wooden boat to feed the steam boiler to get to port, will we run out of boat before we get there?
My point is that 1800s England, 1900s US, 2000 China and India and countries that produce wealth like S Korea
Nevada and California may well be the window on what the US becomes by 2015