3/7/2025
Black eye'
Dennis Elam, a certified public accountant and associate professor in the Accounting and Finance Department at Texas A&M University-San Antonio’s College of Business, said the adverse opinion is a “black eye” for Biglari.
“Regulatory compliance is expensive, but that is another cost of being a public company,” he said in an email. “That is why firms should employ CPAs who are compliant with continuing education license requirements.”
Problems that lead to an adverse audit opinion need to be corrected, he said, adding that changing auditors is not the solution and raises red flags.
“If communication to the Board of Directors and presumably the (board’s) Audit Committee is impaired, we are in (a situation where) the left hand does not know what the right is doing,” Elam said. “It was the lack of internal control at Enron that allowed them to move debt off the balance sheet.” That made the Houston energy company appear more profitable than it was. It went bankrupt in 2001.
Biglari Holdings will need to correct the problem by its next audit, Elam said.
The “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” that Deloitte & Touche prepared as part of Biglari Holdings’ annual report is mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The law regulates financial reporting for public companies and followed financial scandals, including at Enron and telecommunications company Worldcom, which went bankrupt in the wake of accounting fraud.
Oversight
Audits of public companies are overseen by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a nonprofit that launched in 2002. Its mission is to “improve audit quality to protect investors” and it’s been pressing accounting firms to do a better job.
In its 2023 inspection of 56 Deloitte & Touche audits, the board found 12, or 21%, were deficient — meaning the firm “had not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its opinion(s) on the issuer’s financial statements and/or internal control over financial reporting.”
Deloitte & Touche fared better than accounting firms as a whole. The board found 46% of the engagements it reviewed had at least one deficiency related to financial statements and/or internal control over financial reporting, though it added the percentage is “leveling off.”
“Still, overall deficiency rates are unacceptable, and firms must do better,” board Chair Erica Y. Williams said in an August statement. “Now is the time to double down on efforts to improve and deliver the audit quality investors deserve.”
Elam, the UTSA professor, said the board's oversight could be having an impact.
“Perhaps we are seeing a more detailed assessment from some auditors as a result,” he said.
In their answer to the board’s report, Deloitte officials said the firm has taken actions “to comply with our professional responsibilities.”
“We are committed to our shared objective to protect investors and further the public interest in the preparation of informative, accurate, and independent audit reports,” the officials said.
Patrick Danner is a business reporter for the San Antonio Express-News. He can be reached at [email protected].